Juha, of photographs Ansel Adams said that there’s always 2 people concerned, even if no person is visible in the photograph: the photographer and the viewer of the photograph. Most probably it’s similar with such a CCTV camera, and therefore it must be Art!
Who is not, Juha, at least sometimes? And the blur can serve the additional purpose of protecting the blurred one’s privacy (at least so they believe – maybe its even more disclosing)
Well protected indeed, with cameras as well. What does a camera see if nobody is watching?
Juha, of photographs Ansel Adams said that there’s always 2 people concerned, even if no person is visible in the photograph: the photographer and the viewer of the photograph. Most probably it’s similar with such a CCTV camera, and therefore it must be Art!
This is the answer to the question, “What happens when Markus composes a picture and no blurry person walks or rides through the frame?”.
That’s the problem with signatory looks: You have to decide if you respond to expectations or risk something, failures to be accepted đ
I really like Markus’ blurry person photographs, maybe because on most days I’m a blurry person myself.
Who is not, Juha, at least sometimes? And the blur can serve the additional purpose of protecting the blurred one’s privacy (at least so they believe – maybe its even more disclosing)